Gallery slideshow thingy

Some text like you might want to put in a post before the images, followed by a bit of padding. Ab his oratores, ab his imperatores ac rerum publicarum principes extiterunt. Quod eo liquidius faciet, si perspexerit rerum inter eas verborumne sit controversia. Qui non moveatur et offensione turpitudinis et comprobatione honestatis? Saepe ab Aristotele, a Theophrasto mirabiliter est laudata per se ipsa rerum scientia; Intellegi quidem, ut propter aliam quampiam rem, verbi gratia propter voluptatem, nos amemus; Eorum enim omnium multa praetermittentium, dum eligant aliquid, quod sequantur, quasi curta sententia;

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

And then some more lorum ipsum type stuff:

Etiam beatissimum? Deinde disputat, quod cuiusque generis animantium statui deceat extremum. Ego vero volo in virtute vim esse quam maximam; At modo dixeras nihil in istis rebus esse, quod interesset. Est autem officium, quod ita factum est, ut eius facti probabilis ratio reddi possit. Idcirco enim non desideraret, quia, quod dolore caret, id in voluptate est. Eorum enim est haec querela, qui sibi cari sunt seseque diligunt. Honesta oratio, Socratica, Platonis etiam. Neque solum ea communia, verum etiam paria esse dixerunt.

Quamquam te quidem video minime esse deterritum. Vulgo enim dicitur: Iucundi acti labores, nec male Euripidesconcludam, si potero, Latine; Suo genere perveniant ad extremum; Huius, Lyco, oratione locuples, rebus ipsis ielunior. Sedulo, inquam, faciam. Tollenda est atque extrahenda radicitus. Si quidem, inquit, tollerem, sed relinquo. Aliud igitur esse censet gaudere, aliud non dolere. Et nunc quidem quod eam tuetur, ut de vite potissimum loquar, est id extrinsecus; Parvi enim primo ortu sic iacent, tamquam omnino sine animo sint.

Dawlish: Get a GRIP!

It seems you can’t trust the BBC these days!

I was a little sceptical when I read this article on the BBC website, but gave it the benefit of the doubt. Silly me. So it was left to that other world-renowned organ of record, the Plymouth Herald, to put the record straight:

Network Rail last night denied BBC reports that it was only considering the Okehampton route.

A spokeswoman said: “No firm decision has been made at this point.”

The wheels grind very slowly where rail investment is concerned; every project has to go through an eight-phase process called Governance for Railway Investment Projects, or GRIP. Does this sound like it might be a bit bureaucratic? Does it? Here are the phases:

1. Output definition
What are we trying to achieve?
2. Feasibility
Can it be done?
3. Option selection
What’s the best way of doing it? This would be the point where they chose the best route.
4. Single option development
Outline design
5. Detailed design
Um… detailed design
6. Construction test and commission
Well I think we’ve got the hang of this now
7. Scheme hand back
Phew, nearly done
8. Project close out
Who left this shovel here?

If you want more detail, NR/L1/INI/PM/GRIP/100 is yer man.

Any road up, as far as improving the resilience of rail links to the South West peninsula, I think it’s fair to say we’re at GRIP 0.

Avoid Dawlish!

Back in 1855, a certain I K Brunel wrote to the directors of the South Devon Railway to explain that there had been a bit of a mishap on the railway he’d recently built at Dawlish.In a nutshell, the sea had washed away about 50 yards of the embankment. But not to worry! It had been a ‘most unusual’ set of circumstances, involving such eldritch phenomena as ‘waves’ and ‘tides’; there was no reason to think that this stretch of line, viewed in the round and over time, would be any more vulnerable than any other.

By 1933 the South Devon’s successors, the Great Western Railway, had decided that enough was enough – maintaining the sea wall was costing a fortune, and services were being interrupted too often. An inland route was required. Enter the Dawlish Avoiding Line (DAL).

Helpfully, the government was dishing out loans for infrastructure projects at the time, so the GWR developed detailed plans for a new route from Exeter to Newton Abbot, skirting round the back of Dawlish and Teignmouth. They bought the land, and had begun staking out the route when a slight political misunderstanding across the Channel brought things to a halt in August 1939.

After nationalisation, British Railways sold off the land. Presumably they saw no need to divert the GWR now that the London and South Western Railway’s route, via Okehampton and Tavistock, was under the same management. Bad weather still shut the Dawlish line from time to time, but the LSWR route kept things ticking along.

Now things get tricky. When Dr Richard Beeching was looking for places to let rip with his feller buncher, duplicated routes were a prime target. The LSWR route skirted the sparsely-populated edge of Dartmoor. It had branches covering most of North Devon, but they were closing down so that didn’t matter. But the LSWR’s route was inland, and plainly more resilient. The GWR route, on the other hand, served the populous South Devon coast. You might think there was a case to keep both routes open under these circumstances – but no; the LSWR route got the chop.

But it didn’t entirely disappear. The Exeter-Okehampton section stayed open to serve a quarry at Meldon, and the Plymouth-Bere Alston section was retained as part of the line to Gunnislake. That left just 20-mile gap. And there is serious talk of reopening the line from Bere Alston to Tavistock, which would cut the gap down to 15 miles.

So here we are in February 2014, with a big hole at Dawlish where the sea wall used to be, and the south-west peninsula cut off for perhaps 2 months or more. What’s to do? According to the BBC, Network Rail are looking at one option: Reopening the LSWR route.

Beeching, see; he wasn’t always right.